Rated 3.2 out of 5 by 5
Rated 4 out of 5 by TinkerTanner It was great... at first...
The product was great at first but after about two months the ring started looking a little faded. We noticed that one of the diamonds looked like it was missing. When we took it to Zales they cleaned it up for us and it was pretty good again and the diamond was still there. The diamonds close to the gold cross price are inset too far so they don't show up well.
the ring still looks good but it has it's flaws.
July 12, 2015
Rated 1 out of 5 by dmo126 my gf loved it till it started to RUST
This was a beautiful ring but i wouldnt recomend buying it after about 5 months it started to rust im.so disapointed in the quaity of this item.
June 22, 2013
Rated 4 out of 5 by Awhfy Pretty, Classic Band
I bought this ring to wear on my ring finger on trips so I could not worry about losing my $$$ rings on vacation. It's not flashy but overall a good value, very pretty ring at a reasonable price.
January 22, 2013
Rated 2 out of 5 by iheartsparkle So-so
The photo of the ring is deceiving. The diamonds appear MUCH smaller in person and you can actually see a yellow tint in some of the diamonds, which means most of the diamonds are likely closer to J than I in color. Additionally, the diamonds don't even sparkle. I think the problem is the clarity of the stones. The inclusions interfere with the reflective properties. Had the stones been better, I would have given this ring 5 stars, as the diamonds make the ring. As is, however, I give it a 1.5.
January 14, 2013